Request trends
Which demands recur, how wording varies and what triggers follow-up.
Research before benchmarks
What small B2B suppliers are actually asked to provide.
EvidenceFit is building a reviewed, anonymised observation base. No numeric benchmark is published because the minimum evidence and review criteria have not yet been met.
Evidence expectations
Which artifacts requesters ask for and what assurance objective they appear to serve.
Completion effort
Which people and systems contribute, with time measured only from reviewed observations.
Unsupported claims
Where a response lacks adequate current evidence, without identifying contributors.
Methodology
Definitions, collection, classification, exclusions, thresholds and limitations.
Research notes
Qualified observations that are useful before a benchmark meets publication criteria.
Research objective
Make evidence expectations inspectable.
The programme intends to identify recurring request types, likely owners, requested evidence, missing or stale material, follow-up outcomes and the operational work involved—without exposing raw questionnaire text or identifying a company.
Questions the research intends to answer
- Which evidence types appear most often for small B2B suppliers?
- Where do ownership and terminology create delay?
- Which claims most often lack current support?
- What evidence attracts follow-up, and why?
- How many people and systems contribute to a response?
Companies and advisers can contribute anonymised observations →